Free Essays on Facing Reality

Facing Reality Have you ever thought about all the pressure family brings upon you? How about the days when you decide to take a risk, defy the odds, and stand up for what you believe is right? In the stories, â€Å" A & P†, by John Updike and â€Å"Marriage Is A Private Affair†, by Chinua Achebe, Sammy and Nnaemeka both face these obstacles. They both desire to make a change and have other see their own point of views. In â€Å"Marriage Is A Private Affair†, Achebe’s character, Nnaemeka, defies his father’s beliefs. Nnaemeka’s father, Okeke, has set up his son to be married to a local Ibo girl. Okeke has a very strong stance on people from Ibo marrying one another. Nnaemeka has found someone who he loves, but the dilemma between this is she is not an Ibo woman. He has to face his father and tell him that the woman he is choosing to marry is not a local. At first Nnaemeka is hesitant to tell his father. But after much persistence from his fiancà ©, he went to tell him face to face other then just a letter. As Nnaemeka told his father what he had chosen, Okeke face was in disbelief. As stated in the story, â€Å" His father’s silence was infinitely more menacing than a flood of threatening speech.† He couldn’t except that his own son would disgrace the family in such a manor. For about eight years after that, Okeke still had not talked to his son. He didn’t want any part to Nnaemeka and Nene, Nnaemeka’s wife. This story represents how a young man stood up to his father. Nnaemeka knew that his father would never accept the fact that he married someone other then an Ibo woman. He wanted to make his father realize that not all marriages had to be within the tribe. Nnaemeka took a major risk in loosing a relationship with his father. The family pressures of Nnaemeka marrying an Ibo woman didn’t alter the fact that he wanted to marry someone he cared for and loved. Although in the Ibo tribe marriage wasnï ¿ ½... Free Essays on Facing Reality Free Essays on Facing Reality Facing Reality Have you ever thought about all the pressure family brings upon you? How about the days when you decide to take a risk, defy the odds, and stand up for what you believe is right? In the stories, â€Å" A & P†, by John Updike and â€Å"Marriage Is A Private Affair†, by Chinua Achebe, Sammy and Nnaemeka both face these obstacles. They both desire to make a change and have other see their own point of views. In â€Å"Marriage Is A Private Affair†, Achebe’s character, Nnaemeka, defies his father’s beliefs. Nnaemeka’s father, Okeke, has set up his son to be married to a local Ibo girl. Okeke has a very strong stance on people from Ibo marrying one another. Nnaemeka has found someone who he loves, but the dilemma between this is she is not an Ibo woman. He has to face his father and tell him that the woman he is choosing to marry is not a local. At first Nnaemeka is hesitant to tell his father. But after much persistence from his fiancà ©, he went to tell him face to face other then just a letter. As Nnaemeka told his father what he had chosen, Okeke face was in disbelief. As stated in the story, â€Å" His father’s silence was infinitely more menacing than a flood of threatening speech.† He couldn’t except that his own son would disgrace the family in such a manor. For about eight years after that, Okeke still had not talked to his son. He didn’t want any part to Nnaemeka and Nene, Nnaemeka’s wife. This story represents how a young man stood up to his father. Nnaemeka knew that his father would never accept the fact that he married someone other then an Ibo woman. He wanted to make his father realize that not all marriages had to be within the tribe. Nnaemeka took a major risk in loosing a relationship with his father. The family pressures of Nnaemeka marrying an Ibo woman didn’t alter the fact that he wanted to marry someone he cared for and loved. Although in the Ibo tribe marriage wasnï ¿ ½...

Definition and Examples of English Morphology

Definition and Examples of English Morphology Morphology is the branch of linguistics (and one of the major components of grammar) that studies word structures, especially regarding morphemes, which are the smallest units of language. They can be base words or components that form words, such as affixes. The adjective form is  morphological. Morphology Over Time Traditionally, a basic distinction has been made between morphology- which is primarily concerned with the internal structures of words- and syntax, which is primarily concerned with how words are put together in sentences. The term morphology has been taken over from biology where it is used to denote the study of the forms of plants and animals ... It was first used for linguistic purposes in 1859 by the German linguist August Schleicher (Salmon 2000), to refer to the study of the form of words, noted Geert E. Booij, in An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012) In recent decades, however, numerous linguists have challenged this distinction. See, for example, lexicogrammar and lexical-functional grammar (LFG), which consider the interrelationship- even interdependence- between words and grammar. Branches of and Approaches to Morphology The two branches of morphology include the study of the breaking apart (the analytic side) and the reassembling (the synthetic side) of words; to wit, inflectional morphology concerns the breaking apart of words into their parts, such as how suffixes make different verb forms. ​Lexical word formation, in contrast, concerns the construction of new base words, especially complex ones that come from multiple morphemes. Lexical word formation is also called lexical morphology and derivational morphology. Author David Crystal gives these examples: For English, [morphology] means devising ways of describing the properties of such disparate items as a, horse, took, indescribable, washing machine, and antidisestablishmentarianism. A widely recognized approach divides the field into two domains: lexical or derivational morphology studies the way in which new items of vocabulary can be built up out of combinations of elements (as in the case of in-describ-able); inflectional morphology studies the ways words vary in their form in order to express a grammatical contrast (as in the case of horses, where the ending marks plurality). (The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2003) And authors Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fuderman also discuss and give examples of the two approaches this way: The analytic approach has to do with breaking words  down, and it is usually associated with American structuralist linguistics of the first  half of the twentieth century....No matter what language were looking at,  we need analytic methods that are independent of the structures we are examining; preconceived notions might interfere with an objective, scientific analysis. This is especially true when dealing with unfamiliar languages.The second approach to morphology is more often associated with theory than with methodology, perhaps unfairly. This is the synthetic approach. It basically says, I have a lot of little pieces here. How do I put them together? This question presupposes that you already know what the pieces are. Analysis must in some way precede synthesis. (Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fudeman, What Is Morphology? 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011)